This excerpt is from a Peter Baker piece in the New York Times, September 13, reporting a conversation between Obama and various foreign policy
experts. Obama expands on his administration’s role in the Syrian war and
issues a threat against Assad:
* * *
If his thinking has evolved, Mr.
Obama admitted no errors along the way. While some critics, and even his former
secretary of state, Hillary Rodham Clinton, have faulted him for not arming
moderate Syrian rebels years ago, Mr. Obama does not accept the premise that
doing so would have forestalled the rise of ISIS.
“I have thought that through and
tried to apply 20-20 hindsight,” he told some of his guests, as one recalled.
“I’m perfectly willing to admit they were right, but even if they were right, I
still can’t see how that would have changed the situation.”
He defended his decision to wait to
approve airstrikes until last month in Iraq and last week in Syria, saying he
wanted first to force Iraq to replace its government with a more inclusive
coalition that could draw disaffected Sunnis away from supporting ISIS and take
on the task of combating it.
But while Mr. Obama sees bolstering
the new Iraqi government as his path to ultimate success on that side of the
border, he struck his guests as less certain about the endgame on the Syrian
side, where he has called for Mr. Assad to step down and must now rely on the
same moderate Syrian rebels he refused to arm in the past.
Mr. Obama acknowledged it would be
a long campaign, one complicated by a dearth of intelligence about possible
targets on the Syrian side of the border and one that may not be immediately
satisfying. “This isn’t going to be fireworks over Baghdad,” he said.
Asked by one of the columnists what
he would do if his strategy did not work and he had to escalate further, Mr.
Obama rejected the premise. “I’m not going to anticipate failure at this
point,” he said.
He made clear the intricacy of the
situation, though, as he contemplated the possibility that Mr. Assad might
order his forces to fire at American planes entering Syrian airspace. If he
dared to do that, Mr. Obama said he would order American forces to wipe out
Syria’s air defense system, which he noted would be easier than striking ISIS
because its locations are better known. He went on to say that such an action
by Mr. Assad would lead to his overthrow, according to one account.
* * *
Peter Baker, “Paths
to War, Then and Now, Haunt Obama,” New York Times, September 13, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment