Sergey Lavrov, the Russian Foreign Minster, answered questions from the mass media on June 15, 2014:
* * *
* * *
Question: How would you comment on the destruction of the
Russian Embassy in Kiev and statements by the Acting Foreign Minister of
Ukraine, Andrii Deshchytsia? What is being undertaken to free correspondents of
Zvezda TV channel, who were seized in Ukraine?
Sergey Lavrov: We continue to deal with the matter of
clarifying the events around the Russian Embassy in Kiev, as well as the
situation regarding the seizure of the journalists from Zvezda TV channel. In
both cases we sent official notes the Ukrainian authorities having requested
the immediate liberation of the journalists and determination of their
location. There are some contacts right now within the ambit of the Russian
General Consulate in Kharkov and the headquarters of the military attaché of
the Russian Embassy (in Kiev).
As to the bacchanalia organised by the youths using neo-Nazi
and other indecent slogans about our Embassy in Kiev, we sent an official note
to the Ukrainian Ministry of Foreign Affairs requesting them to find and punish
those who are guilty and to repay the serious damage, which was inflicted. We
will try to get an intelligible reaction from our Ukrainian colleagues.
I was especially offended that the Acting Ukrainian Foreign Minister,
Andrii Deshchytsia, who was appointed by the Verkhovna Rada, who addressed the
so-called “protesters” at the Russian Embassy, and either admonished the crowd
or participated in this bacchanalia allowing himself to make statements going
beyond the bounds of decency. I understand that he has good teachers, because
those, who actively support the current Ukrainian authorities in Washington, do
not avoid the use of strong language. Nevertheless, a diplomat, and Andrii
Deshchytsia is a diplomat, should be selective in his language. I do not know
how he is going to communicate with us and work with us now.
In fact, I want to say that I have no particular reasons to
believe that the attack on the Russian Embassy was organised by the Ukrainian
authorities. But I have no doubt that it is a reflection of the impunity the
Ukrainian authorities enjoy (with satisfaction, I guess), because at least some
of our western partners cover them up. This impunity is showing up in the
arrogance of the Ukrainian authorities with regard to the gas negotiations,
when they reject all reasonable compromises, which are proposed by Russia one
after another and which are supported and understood by representatives of the
European Union. We do not like the fact that some third power supports this
arrogant and absolutely unacceptable position. We have reasons to believe that
it is so.
Similar approaches have been observed in the categorical
statements regarding the intention to sign the free trade zone and association
agreement with the European Union on the 27 June without any changes. And this
happens despite the multiple promises regarding the need to consult in the
trilateral format (Ukraine-Russia-EU), looking at how we can achieve that and
the development of relations between Ukraine and the European Union is not
contrary to its rights and obligations in the CIS free trade zone.
Of course, the main thing concerning us now is the lack of
any practical actions to implement the frequent assurances that the fire in the
South-East will be stopped, a cease-fire will be announced and they will start
to search for agreements with the South-East regarding the separation of the
two confronting parties and begin a mutually respectful dialogue to find
solutions, which would satisfy the expectations of all the regions and
political forces of Ukraine.
I will highlight again that I cannot get rid of a feeling
that either somebody is consulting Ukrainians to make their position inexorable
in all the issues, or it is some kind of “dizziness from success”.
We are worried that this impunity is showing up more and
more frequently. The case with journalists from Zvezda TV channel (not the
first capture of mass media representatives) and the absolutely disgusting
attack on the Russian Embassy is a reflection of this trend. By the way, let us
not forget that militants from the so-called battalion Azov, which was created
and financed by Ihor Kolomoyskyi, who was appointed the governor of
Dnepropetrovsk by the current Kiev authorities, played the leading role in the
attack on the Embassy. This is a good reason for our western partners, who
support all the steps by the Ukrainian authorities in every possible way, to
think how they use the authority they received after the “Maidan”.
I will highlight again, we will request immediate actions to
free the Russian journalists. We are dealing with this closely within the ambit
of our diplomatic bodies (in Ukraine). We will request the establishment of
those, who are guilty, and their punishment and compensation for the damages
inflicted as a result of their attack on the Embassy.
Question: How do you evaluate the actions by the Ukrainian
authorities, who initiated a criminal case about hooliganism with regard to the
attack on the Russian Embassy in Kiev, as well as the reaction of the
international community?
Sergey Lavrov: We will follow the actions by the Ukrainian
authorities attentively. The main thing for us is that they do not qualify such
crimes as a pure accident – some young hooligans came, threw some brilliant
green and eggs and t that is all. These are serious things. I can say that our
diplomats believed that the goal of the attackers was to occupy the building of
the Embassy physically. There are reasons to believe that they wanted blood to
be spilt.
As to the reaction of our western partners, when we learned
about the attack on the Embassy, I contacted the President of Switzerland,
Didier Burkhalter, who is the Current OSCE President, immediately. Later I also
talked to German and French partners. We also approached the leaders of the
U.S. Department of State. Respective signals were sent to all of them,
including appeals to use their influence on the Ukrainian leaders to make them
use their power. You know that special units were at a walking distance from the
Embassy, but they did nothing despite the fact that the Ukrainian Minister of
the Interior, Arsen Avakov, also came to the place of these events and talked
to the crowd, but he gave no orders to stop absolutely wrongful actions which
were in violation of all the Ukrainian obligations under Vienna conventions.
Our western partners assured us and our diplomats in
respective capitals that they condemn this action. However, when we proposed a
draft statement in the UN Security Council, these were our western partners who
refused to support it. They attempted to link this document with the
proposition to condemn the incident involving a plane, which was pranged in the
South-East, and some other incidents, which have nothing to do with the main
issue– the inviolability of diplomatic representations is unconditional. And
the task of fighting terrorism is unconditional as well. We were disappointed
by such a position taken by our western colleagues. I think that this does not
enhance the reputation to the European and US diplomatic school.
* * *
Answers to questions from the Russian mass media by the Russian Foreign Minister, Sergey Lavrov, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, June 16, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment