Russian President
Vladimir Putin’s remarks at a Security Council meeting in the Kremlin, July 22,
2014:
* * *
Today we will consider the fundamental issues of maintaining
the sovereignty and territorial integrity of this country. We all understand
how many political, ethnic, legal, social, economic and other aspects this topic
encompasses.
Sovereignty and territorial integrity are fundamental
values, as I have already said. We are referring to the maintenance of the
independence and unity of our state, to the reliable protection of our
territory, our constitutional system and to the timely neutralisation of
internal and external threats, of which there are quite a few in the world
today. I should make it clear from the start that, obviously, there is no
direct military threat to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of this
country. Primarily, the strategic balance of forces in the world guarantees
this.
We, on our part, strictly comply with the norms of
international law and with our commitments to our partners, and we expect other
countries, unions of states and military-political alliances to do the same,
while Russia is fortunately not a member of any alliance. This is also a
guarantee of our sovereignty.
Any nation that is part of an alliance gives up part of its
sovereignty. This does not always meet the national interests of a given
country, but this is their sovereign decision. We expect our national legal
interests to be respected, while any controversies that always exist, to be
resolved only through diplomatic efforts, by means of negotiations. Nobody
should interfere in our internal affairs.
However, ever more frequently today we hear of ultimatums
and sanctions. The very notion of state sovereignty is being washed out.
Undesirable regimes, countries that conduct an independent policy or that
simply stand in the way of somebody’s interests get destabilised. Tools used
for this purpose are the so-called colour revolutions, or, in simple terms –
takeovers instigated and financed from the outside.
The focus is of course on internal problems. Any country
always has plenty of problems, especially the more unstable states, or states
with a complicated regime. Problems do exist, still it is not clear why they
should be used to destabilise and break down a country – something we see
rather frequently in various parts of the world.
Frequently the forces used here are radical, nationalist,
often even neo-fascist, fundamental forces, as was the case, unfortunately, in
many post-Soviet states, and as is the case with Ukraine now. What we see is
practically the same thing.
People came to power through the use of armed force and by
unconstitutional means. True, they held elections after the takeover, however,
for some strange reason, power ended up again in the hands of those who either
funded or carried out this takeover. Meanwhile, without any attempt at
negotiations, they are trying to supress by force that part of the population
that does not agree with such a turn of events.
At the same time, they present Russia with an ultimatum:
either you let us destroy the part of the population that is ethnically,
culturally and historically close to Russia, or we introduce sanctions against
you. This is a strange logic, and absolutely unacceptable, of course.
As for the terrible tragedy that occurred in the sky above
Donetsk – we would like once again to express our condolences to the families
of the victims; it is a terrible tragedy. Russia will do everything within its
power to ensure a proper comprehensive and transparent investigation. We are
asked to influence the militia in the southeast. As I have said, we will do
everything in our power, but this is absolutely insufficient.
Yesterday when the militia forces were handing over the
so-called black boxes, the armed forces of Ukraine launched a tank attack at
the city of Donetsk. The tanks battled through to the railway station and
opened fire at it. International experts who came to investigate the disaster
site could not stick their heads out. It
was clearly not the militia forces shooting at themselves.
We should finally call on the Kiev authorities to comply
with elementary norms of human decency and introduce a cease-fire for at least
some short period of time to make the investigation possible. We will of course
do everything in our power to make sure the investigation is thorough.
This is exactly why Russia supported the [UN] Security
Council Resolution proposed by Australia. We will continue working together
with all our partners to ensure a complete and comprehensive investigation.
However, if we get back to such scenarios in general, as I have said, they are
absolutely unacceptable and counterproductive. They destabilize the existing
world order.
Undoubtedly, such methods will not work with Russia. The
recipes used regarding weaker states fraught with internal conflict will not
work with us. Our people, the citizens of Russia will not let this happen and
will never accept this.
However, attempts are clearly being made to destabilize the
social and economic situation, to weaken Russia in one way or another or to
strike at our weaker spots, and they will continue primarily to make us more
agreeable in resolving international issues.
So-called international competition mechanisms are being
used as well (this applies to both politics and the economy); for this purpose
the special services’ capabilities are used, along with modern information and
communication technologies and dependent, puppet non-governmental organizations
– so-called soft force mechanisms. This, obviously, is how some countries
understand democracy.
We have to give an adequate response to such challenges,
and, most importantly, to continue working in a systematic way to resolve the issues
that carry a potential risk for the unity of our country and our society.
In the past few years, we have strengthened our state and
public institutions, the basics of Russian federalism, and we have made
progress in regional development, in resolving economic and social tasks. Our
law enforcement agencies and special services have become more efficient in
combatting terrorism and extremism; we are forming a modern basis of our ethnic
policy, adjusting approaches to education; we are constantly combatting
corruption – all this guarantees our security and sovereignty.
At the same time, we should keep these issues in mind. If
necessary, we have to quickly develop and implement additional measures. We
need to have a long-term plan of action in these areas, strategic documents and
resolutions.
In this regard, I would like to draw attention to several
priority challenges.
The first is working consistently to strengthen interethnic
harmony, ensure a competent migration policy, and react rigidly to inactions by
officials and crimes that may be triggered by interethnic conflicts.
These are challenges for all levels of government, from the
federal to the municipal. And, of course, it is extremely important for our
civil society to take an active position and react to infringements on human
rights and freedoms, helping to prevent radicalism and extremism.
We are particularly relying on civil society for effective
help in improving the system of state governance with regard to ethnic policy
and educating young people about the spirit of patriotism and responsibility
for the fate of their Fatherland, which is particularly important. We discussed
this in great detail recently at a meeting of the Council for Interethnic
Relations.
By the way, I want to clearly state that - with the help of
the civil society – we will never entertain the thought of improving our work
in these areas solely by cracking down, so to speak. We will not do that under
any circumstances; we will rely on civil society, first and foremost.
Our second important challenge is protecting constitutional
order. Constitutional supremacy and economic and legal unity must be ensured
throughout all of Russia. Federal
standards as defined by the Constitution are inviolable and nobody has the
right to break the law and infringe on citizens’ rights.
It is important for all Russians, regardless of where they
live, to have equal rights and equal opportunities. This is the foundation for
a democratic system. We must rigorously observe these Constitutional principles,
and to do this, we must build a clear system of state authority, striving to
ensure that all its components function as a united whole, precisely and
systemically; this should include increasing local authorities’ role as part of
Russia’s overall government mechanism. And naturally, reinforcing the efficacy
of the work of the judicial system, the prosecutors, and the regulatory and
supervisory authorities should strengthen Russia’s statehood.
The third key challenge is sustainable and balanced economic
and social development. At the same time, it is fundamentally important to take
into account territorial and regional factors. I mean that we must ensure
priority development for strategically important regions, including in the Far
East and other areas; we must simultaneously reduce drastic gaps between
regions in terms of the economic situation and people’s living standards. All
this needs to be taken into account when developing federal and sectorial
programmes, improving inter-budgetary relations and building plans to develop
infrastructure, selecting locations for new plants and creating modern jobs.
I also feel that we must think about additional steps to
decrease the dependence of the national economy and financial system on
negative external factors. I am not just referring to instability in global
markets, but possible political risks as well.
Fourth, our Armed Forces remain the most important guarantor
of our sovereignty and Russia’s territorial integrity. We will react
appropriately and proportionately to the approach of NATO’s military
infrastructure toward our borders, and we will not fail to notice the expansion
of global missile defence systems and increases in the reserves of strategic
non-nuclear precision weaponry.
We are often told that the ABM system is a defence system.
But that’s not the case. This is an offensive system; it is part of the
offensive defence system of the United States on the periphery. Regardless of
what our foreign colleagues say, we can clearly see what is actually happening:
groups of NATO troops are clearly being reinforced in Eastern European states,
including in the Black and Baltic seas. And the scale and intensity of
operational and combat training is growing. In this regard, it is imperative to
implement all planned measures to strength our nation’s defence capacity fully
and on schedule, including, of course, in Crimea and Sevastopol, where
essentially we need to fully recreate the military infrastructure.
* * *
Security
Council meeting, President of Russia website, July 22, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment